Hello all,
I guess I've got to send this as I've already had about 5 responses claiming
the same thing. This is not a disk bottleneck. The ZFS partition is capable
of performing at the theoretical max of the drives. The machine is performing
at less than 5 MB combined. I'm assuming that this is a problem with the NFSv3
throughput. I just 'dd' 1000 1MB records (about 1GB) from the clients to
their respective servers:
Client 1 to NetAPP: 3 tests for 45.9, 45.1, 46.1 Pretty consistent
Client 2 to FreeBSD/ZFS: 3 test for 29.7, 12.5, 19.1 NOT consistent (also,
the drives were lucky to hit 12% busy.
I'm about to mount these servers to each client and see if there's a variation
(although they are hw configured the same and bought the same time.)
I'll write after this. However, if more people could review the configurations
below and see if there's anything glaring.... However, the lack of consistency
shows something is wrong network wise.
P.
________________________________
From: Paul Patterson <pathia...@yahoo.com>
To: Paul Patterson <pathia...@yahoo.com>; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 9:47:59 AM
Subject: Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning
Hi,
as promised, the parameter tuning I have on the box (does anyone see anything
wrong?)
/boot/loader.conf
kern.hz="100"
vm.kmem_size_max="1536M"
vm.kmem_size="1536M"
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disble=1
/etc/sysctl.conf
kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768
kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192
kern.maxfiles=65536
kern.maxfilesperproc=32768
kern.mxvnodes=600000
net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0
net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0
net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=0
net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_auto=1
net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=16384
net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=16777216
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_auto=1
net.inet.tcpsendbuf_inc=8192
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344
net.inet.udp.recvspace=65536
net.local.stream.recvspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=16777216
________________________________
From: Paul Patterson <pathia...@yahoo.com>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:04:37 PM
Subject: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning
Hi,
I just set up my first machine with ZFS. (First, ZFS is nothing short of
amazing) I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 as an NFS server with ZFS striped across
two volumes (just testing throughput for now.) Anyhow, I was benching this
box, 4GB or RAM, the volume is on 2x146 GB SAS 10K rpm drives and it's an HP
Proliant DL360 with dual Gb interfaces. (device bce)
Now, I believe that I have tuned this box to the hilt with all the parameters
that I can think of (it's at work right now so I'll cut and paste all the
sysctls and loader.conf parameters for ZFS and networking) and it still seems
to have some type of bottleneck.
I have two Debian Linux clients that I use to bench with. I run a script that
makes calls that writes to the NFS device and, after about 30 minutes, starts
to delete the initial data and follow behind writing and deleting.
Here's what's happening: The "other" machine is a NetAPP. It's got 1GB of RAM
and it's running RAID DP with 2 parity drives and 6 data drives, all SATA 750
GB 7200 RPM drives with dual Gb interfaces.
The benchmark script manages to write lots of little (all less than 30KB) files
at a rate of 11,000 per minute, however, after 30 minutes, when it starts
deleting, the throughput on write goes to 9500 and deletion is 6000 per minute.
If I turn on the second node, I get 17,000 writing combined with about 11,000
deletions combined. One way or another, this will overflow in time. Not good.
Now, on to my pet project. :-) The FreeBSD/ZFS server is only able to maintain
about 3500 writes per minute but also deletes at the same rate! (I would
expect deletion to be at least as fast as writing) The drives are running at
only 20-35% while this is going on and only putting down about 4-5 MB/sec each.
So, at 1Gb or ~92MB/sec theoretical max (is that about right?) There's
something wrong somewhere. I'm assuming it's the network. (I'll post all the
tunings tomorrow.)
Thinking something wrong, I mounted only one client to each server (they are
identical clients and the same configuration as the FreeBSD box). I did a
simple stream of: dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/nfs bs=1m count=1000. The FreeBSD
box wins?! It cranked up the drives to 45-50 MB/sec each and balanced them
perfectly on transactions/sec KB/sec, etc from systat -vm. (Woohoo!) The
NetAPPs CPU was at over 35-40% constantly, (it does that while benching, too)
I'll post the NetAPP finding tomorrow as I forgot it for now.
As for the client mounting, it was with the options:
nfsvers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,intr,async,noatime
I'm trying to figure out why, when running this benchmark, can the NetAPP with
WAFL nearly triple the FreeBSD/ZFS box.
Also, I'm having something strange happen when I try to mount the disk from the
FreeBSD server versus the NetAPP. The FreeBSD server will sometimes RPC
timeout. Mounting the NetAPP is instantaneous.
That's the beginning. If I have a list of things to check tomorrow, I will.
I'd like to see the little machine that could kick the NetAPPs butt. (No
offense to NetAPP. :-) )
Thank you for reading,
Paul
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
