> What disadvantages does it have in term of security in comparison with
> "block all"? In other words, how bad it is to have all outgoing ports always
> opened and whether someone can use this to hack the sysem?
> 

It's the principle of 'least privilege'.  Explicitly allow what is permitted, 
deny everything else. 

It should also be 

        block log all

A default block policy without logging has a certain ass biting inevitability 
to it. 



Greg
 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to