Doug Barton wrote: > Craig Boston wrote: ... >> Though I still think "leaf ports" and "root ports" should be listed >> together. > > I have gone back and forth on that a few times myself. Does anyone > else have an opinion?
I like the difference. Maybe because I also like 'pkg_tree -v' and 'pkg_tree -t -q' and the dependency graph tool from Garrett Wollman (at http://people.freebsd.org/~wollman/portdeps.pl) together with graphviz. It generates output like http://lambermont.dyndns.org/freebsd/ports.png (my setup) where the root ports are the upper-left boxes and the leaf ports are the right-side boxes. Ports that are depended on are ellipses. groetjes, Hans Lambermont _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
