On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> ...                         I have for some time wanted to add support
> to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install
> sensible defaults for rc.conf, 

What's the advantage of doing that over having the the  defaults
in the rc.d script, which is generally what happens now for
scripts installed by ports. 

It would allow a port to install variant defaults, but that sounds
very confusing.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to