On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:09:16 +0300, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> V.Chukharev wrote: >> I have found why there is a difference in INDEX-7 generated with and without >> caching. >> Without cache security/p5-openxpki* (6 connected ports) are indexed as >> depending on >> both openssl-0.9.8h_1 and openssl-beta-0.9.8h_1 (beta is not actually >> installed), >> while with cache the second dependence is lost. This is due to >> WITH_OPENSSL_BETA >> defined in security/p5-openxpki/Makefile (master for other slave ports). >> >> So, Dirk, you are right, cashing breaks current behavior. > > No, it means that you need to add extra checks to how the cached value > is used. This is also true, but it might be spreaded over many ports and/or bsd.*.mk files... > Kris > >> But now I wonder if the current behavior is correct and if >> security/p5-openxpki is >> correct. IMHO at least one of the two dependences is in err. Can you comment on this? >>> Best regards, >>> Vladimir >>> >>>> Kris >>>> >> > -- Vladimir Chukharev Tampere University of Technology _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"