[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Marshall) writes: >On Tue, 02 Dec 2008, 21:07 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: >> I think the most convenient way of implementing this is having >> a directory hierarchy (either two level ${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/patch-*) >> or single level ${PORTNAME}/patch-*) and a single variable that makes >> port system look there for patches in addition to ${PATCHDIR}.
>Or keep local patches under /var/db/ports/<port> rather than building a >new tree? Hmm. I haven't really understood the way directories get named in /var/db/ports/ - what happens when there is a collision in the base name of two ports? It seems less obvious than /<foo>/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/ -- G. Paul Ziemba FreeBSD unix: 6:11PM up 2 days, 3:41, 8 users, load averages: 1.58, 1.39, 1.31 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"