On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:14:20AM +0000, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Marshall) writes: > > >On Tue, 02 Dec 2008, 21:07 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > >> I think the most convenient way of implementing this is having > >> a directory hierarchy (either two level ${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/patch-*) > >> or single level ${PORTNAME}/patch-*) and a single variable that makes > >> port system look there for patches in addition to ${PATCHDIR}. > > >Or keep local patches under /var/db/ports/<port> rather than building a > >new tree? > > Hmm. I haven't really understood the way directories get named in > /var/db/ports/ - what happens when there is a collision in the > base name of two ports? It seems less obvious than > /<foo>/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/
It uses UNIQUENAME, which is documented in Mk/bsd.port.mk. -- WXS _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"