On Friday 17 April 2009 14:09:51 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Oleg Ginzburg wrote: > > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco: > > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco. > > > > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco > > make install > > ... > > (i have deco archivers) > > pkg_add -r deco > > > > (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco) > > > > pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco > > [Updating the pkgdb <format:bdb_btree> in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages > > found (-1 +1) (...). done] > > deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6 > > > > pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\* > > Can you open a PR for this problem? I think it is really bad. If two > ports are installing same files, then there must be set CONFLICTS in > Makefile.
Ok. > > The next thing is that I think there should not be the two ports with > the same name. IMHO, soon or later, problems like that will be surface is frequency . More so, a package numbers is increase day by day. May be location like /usr/local/bin/* most certainly controlling by some stuff through analyzing/scanning pkg-plist files for stop potential collision? > > Miroslav Lachman _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"