On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Erik Trulsson <ertr1...@student.uu.se> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: >> >> as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever >> >> option to tell ports that you just do not want an x server or any of >> >> it's 500kg friends. but i can not seem to find it. >> > I think you're looking for WITHOUT_X11=yes :) >> >> i have that. i still get a lot of x with some ports. i will try to >> keep a watch for which ones. > > > Well, there are many ports which depend unconditionally upon X. > If you install one of them (or some other port which depends on one of them) > you will get X, no questions asked. > > WITHOUT_X11 is useful for those ports which have an optional dependency upon > X, but that is all it does. > > > There does not exist any flag which tells the ports-system to refuse to > build any ports which depend on X, which seems to be what you want.
Something like the following would work as a safety net. --- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk.orig 2009-05-26 13:42:52.000000000 +0100 +++ /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk 2009-05-26 13:42:58.000000000 +0100 @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ # xserver - there's only one atm, I guess everything can fit into the port itself .if defined(XORG_CAT) + +. if defined(WITHOUT_X11) +IGNORE= me not want x11 +. endif + # Default variables, common to all new modular xorg ports. .if !defined(USE_TGZ) USE_BZIP2= yes -- Florent Thoumie f...@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
