Andrius Morkūnas wrote: > Anyone who uses config-recursive more often than once a year knows that > it's broken. Or at least they know it needs to be run multiple times until > it doesn't show options dialog. While some people might just live with it, > I think it should be fixed properly, and so did the person who introduced > this target: "it sufficed to run config-recursive twice to catch all of the > dependancies I had configured. Maybe we can figure out how to it all in one > pass later"[1]. The "later" is now, almost 5 years after config-recursive > was first introduced [2].
Nice work, did you PR this? -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
