On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:16:32PM +0200, Gabor PALI wrote: > > Recently I have tagged the following popular but Cabalized > applications > in the Ports Collection with the "hs-" prefix: > > - darcs [1]: devel/darcs -> devel/hs-darcs > - pandoc [2]: textproc/pandoc -> textproc/hs-pandoc > - xmonad [3]: x11-wm/xmonad -> x11-wm/hs-xmonad, x11-wm/xmonad-contrib > -> x11-wm/hs-xmonad-contrib > - xmobar [4]: x11/xmobar -> x11/hs-xmobar >
[snip] > > Please send "+1" or "-1" depending on whether you support or object > this > change. Thank you! > -1 I tend to agree with Dmitry, for the reasons he articulated. In the case of end-user applications, the language of choice generally is of no concern to the user. However: we lack consistency elsewhere in ports with the other prefixes. This probably just stirs things up even more. :-) -- Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
