On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org > > and that in this case needs to be done with the port ftp/proftpd itself?
Presumably/hopefully, the proftpd tarball which contained the backdoor would fail to match the distinfo for the port: SHA256 (proftpd-1.3.3c.tar.bz2) = ea7f02e21f81e6ce79ebde8bbbd334bd269a039ac9137196a35309f791b24db1 SIZE (proftpd-1.3.3c.tar.bz2) = 4166609 Checking, the tarball you now fetch is the one which matches their md5 and GnuPG signing from the link above... Regards, -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
