2011/2/2 Steve Randall <srandal...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100 > Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.darous...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dya...@gmail.com>: >> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100 >> > Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all >> >> >> >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or >> >> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice >> >> >> >> Can you please test it? >> >> >> >> by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde and gnome >> >> integration. (sorry but my poor CPU already hates enough :)) >> >> >> >> All languages supported are build. >> >> >> >> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a >> >> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30 >> >> with java) >> >> >> >> at this points : >> >> there is (I guess) only one remaining problem : >> >> which launching libreoffice it can't find it libraries, I haven't >> >> decided yet wether to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the wrapper script or to >> >> add ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib and ldconfig -m >> >> ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/base3.3/program >> >> >> >> maybe it conflicts with openoffice I haven't checked yet. >> >> >> >> to test it you will need a fresh ports tree (the needed libtextcat >> >> modification was committed yesterday thanks thierry@) >> >> >> >> the mandatory screenshot : >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice-3.3.0-final.png >> >> >> >> I expect to be able to push it in the tree during next week (after >> >> finding a good way to deal with the libraries and checked if it >> >> conflicts with openoffice) >> >> >> >> I would like to thanks Robert Nagy from openbsd, he has made all the >> >> hard work :), he was also very helpful. >> >> >> > >> > Thanks for work! > > I second that. > > >> > >> > I have one comment: >> > >> > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xI libreo >> > libreoffice-3.3.0 Full integrated office productivity suite >> > >> > now I'm trying `pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0` but got errors: >> > >> > tiger# pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0 >> > tar: lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No >> > such file or directory >> > tar: >> > lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/deploymentfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No >> > such file or directory >> > >> > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xL libreo |grep basprovfx.uno.so >> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so >> > >> > [tiger@tiger]~%file >> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so >> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: cannot >> > open `/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so' (No >> > such file or directory) >> > >> > tiger# find work/ -type f -name basprovfx.uno.so >> > tiger# pwd >> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice >> > >> > broken pkg-plist ? >> > >> >> regards, >> >> Bapt >> > >> > -- >> > wbr, tiger >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >> > >> >> seems like but I really don't know how to figure out what you have or >> have not in your box that prevent basprovfx.uno.so and consors to be >> built > > Have you tried building on i386? It looks like you generated the > packing list on amd64. I'm not sure if that explains basprovfx.uno.so, > but it's definitely a problem. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > Yes I did try on i386.
--- Bapt _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
