On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:03:58PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 27.04.2011 14:16, Eitan Adler wrote: > > Then bapt@ marked the ports*deprecated* which does not mean deleted. It > > was a warning that people who were interested should step up and take up > > the work. If after N amount of time no one does so they will be > > individually deleted. > The ports I listed -- db2 and apache13* family -- are/were not broken. What > "work" are you talking about? > > Yet, mandree deleted db2 on April 12th and dougb is anxious to delete > apache13 as well instead of simply disowning it...
apache13 is EOL upstream. We should not have ports for EOL software. I don't care if it works perfectly fine and someone wants to hand-roll patches back to it. If upstream says it's dead, who are we to keep it alive? -- WXS _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
