On May 10, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:05:02AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports? >> >> This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port >> octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which >> currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), and >> the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function perfectly >> well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf conflict >> with each other. >> >> If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I >> currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) >> >> Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? > > science/paraview is currently built with hdf5. > Perhaps you should ask its maintainer, de...@stasyan.com, > whether hdf5-18 is a good idea.
Moving up to hdf5-18 would be best, if it's possible. Quincey _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"