Hi Stephen, As the maintainer of octave port, if hdf5-18 is sufficient, it's okay to replace with it.
Thanks, Nakata Maho From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <step...@missouri.edu> Subject: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 08:05:02 -0500 > Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports? > > This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port > octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which > currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), > and the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function > perfectly well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf > conflict with each other. > > If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. > (I currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) > > Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? > > Thanks, Stephen > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
