On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:08 +0400 Dmitry Marakasov articulated: > * Martin Wilke (m...@freebsd.org) wrote: > > > >> They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything > > >> about those, that is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status. The > > >> "not used anymore" mean not used in > > > Why should we go through it again and again? If it's not broken, > > > it's useable, you may not remove it, period. > > > > > >> the portstree (ie no more depended on). > > > Most of the portstree is leaf ports, now what? > > > > > >> If someone really needs it, he can: > > > What we need is to not have to do extra work and to not have > > > extra noise on the maillist because someone does unneeded things. > > > I really don't want to call that vandalism. > > > > > You can't only put in u have also to put out. > > Why don't we take out Gnome and KDE then? I don't use it.
That reality might come sooner than you think but for an entirely different reason. http://www.technograte.com/2011/05/18/gnome-to-drop-support-for-bsd-solaris-unix/ http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/05/gnome-to-drop-support-for-bsd-solaris-unix/ -- Jerry ♔ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
