On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman <m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> By its >>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port >>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >>>>> PORTREVISION bump happen. >> >>> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked >>> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated >>> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put >>> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't >>> been able to put the time into making it happen. >> >> How about something like the attached? > > Ooops. Wrong diff. Like this:
Why have you included IGNOREd? Just curious.... Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
