On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:05:49AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 21/08/2012 00:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:09:46AM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> Please [...] ask question about pkgng [...] > >> > >> What would be the best practice of mixing ports with packages? > >> > >> The use case I have in mind is compiling Xorg ports locally > >> WITH_NEW_XORG and WITH_KMS, and using packages from > >> pkgbeta.freebsd.org for everything else. Is there some mixture of pkg > >> and portmaster flags that allows this kind of setup? > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > > > There is no best practice for that unfortunatly, (as actually) the best for > > you > > is maybe to build your own pkgng repostories? > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer#Using_poudriere for example? > > > > We are open to suggestion here :) > > At the moment, it is about as tricky as mixing locally compiled ports > with pkg_tools packages: ie. it might work, or it might leave you a > quivering, sobbing mess lost in a pit of dark despair. > > One thing that should help is a proposal to record metadata like the SVN > revision number of the ports tree used to build repository packages into > the repository catalogue (repo.sqlite), so users can in principle check > out the same revision locally to build their own ports. Unfortunately > no one has written that yet, and its probably too late for it to make it > into release-1.0. >
yes but it should definitly find its way to 1.1! regards, Bapt
pgppErHxBkzUn.pgp
Description: PGP signature