On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:20:15AM +0200, John Marino wrote: > On 4/3/2013 11:17, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > Firstly, is there a better mailing list to discuss poudriere? > > > > I'm just getting my feet wet with poudriere, and are a bit surprised that > > all dependencies for a port are built, instead of installing the packages > > that got built earlier already. Is this intentional? Is there a > > configuration option to have the requisite packages installed before > > building a port? > > > > > That's not normal behavior. > When I saw something like that, it turned out to be a bug in the > bsd.port.mk but that should not apply for you. > > There's a #poudriere channel at freenode IRC. > > John > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
This mailing list is fine also [email protected] is more accurate for this. And no it is not normal poudriere should always reuse previously built packages if they are built for the same combinaison jailname/portstreename/setname. regards, Bapt
pgpjKtGMa0mUW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
