On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote: > We generally don't refer to pkgng in the docs: please use "pkg".
Well, I saw pkg written as "pkgng" in some other section (5.2.2.2. "PORTEPOCH") of the Porter's Handbook. Actually, I prefer to write it as pkg(8), but I am not sure if there has been a DocBook entity defined for it. > Further, I'd put the pkg cases first as the pkg_ tools are deprecated. I do not think that matters much. > + <application>poudriere</application>. These maintain > > Thanks for adding this. Note this is not complete. I believe poudriere would finally deserve an own section in the documentation, somewhere after Tinderbox. > + <para>For ports that install kernel modules, the > > This should be in a different section specifically about kernel modules. This is related to staging, that is why it is there. I did not find any section on kernel modules, for what it is worth, the expression "kernel module" occurs only twice in the whole book -- hence I did not feel myself motivated to start a new section on kernel modules; at least, not for now. > + staging) but it is broken (Mailman up to 2.1.16, for instance). > > I would not mention specific ports here. Examples get old quick. I do not think this situation will change any time soon. > This looks good overall and thanks for working on it. Thanks for the feedback. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
