On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Gabor Pali wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote:
We generally don't refer to pkgng in the docs: please use "pkg".
Well, I saw pkg written as "pkgng" in some other section (5.2.2.2.
"PORTEPOCH") of the Porter's Handbook. Actually, I prefer to write it
as pkg(8), but I am not sure if there has been a DocBook entity
defined for it.
Just checked, and presently there is no man page entity for it. Using a
man page entity might be questionable anyway: there is no man page for
pkg on FreeBSD 9 and earlier unless ports-mgmt/pkg has been installed.
(I'm not going to mention /usr/sbin/pkg, which should not have been
given the same name because now we can't tell which "pkg" is being
discussed. See how I didn't mention it there?)
Further, I'd put the pkg cases first as the pkg_ tools are deprecated.
I do not think that matters much.
Agreed. Actually, until pkg_* is deprecated for 9.x and earlier, it is
by far the most common.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
