On 2/7/2014 14:43, Benjamin Podszun wrote: > Hi. > > Change of mail address, new thread with a decent title (previously: > prosody update, which is sort of independent as far as I've confirmed so > far). > > With the attached patch luasec-0.5 builds & installs fine in my > environment. > > IF (capitals used for a reason..) I understand the following output > correctly, there's just one (known) consumer for that port: > > #pkg info -r lua51-luasec > lua51-luasec-0.4: > prosody-0.9.2 > > (where prosody in this case is already bumped to the last release, I'm > trying to push that in [1], as a follow-up to a 0.9.1 bump that never > landed) > > Would it be correct to assume that therefor the risk in bumping luasec > is quite small, especially since I'm successfully _running_ prosody [2] > using that port? > > Being utterly clueless: What's the right procedure to move forward, > especially without a dedicated maintainer for that thing? Hoping for a > sponsor on this list? Should I stop the discussion here and send a PR > instead - hoping that someone accepts that one? > > Thanks a lot in advance, > Ben
Hi Ben, One approach is to submit this patch as a PR but add a change to make the yourself the maintainer! Then you're coming from a position of authority that the port needs bumping. :) seriously, why not? John _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
