Am 11.02.2014 10:46, schrieb Rainer Hurling:

> I just recognized another issue, what I think is not intended.
> 
> Newest graphics/rawtherapee installs and uses devel/libc++. This wanted
> behaviour is included in the ports Makefile for OpenMP reasons.
> 
> As a side effect, other ports with c++ usage also seem to grab
> devel/libc++, even if devel/libc++ is not mentioned in the ports
> Makefile. You can try this by rebuilding and reinstalling e.g.
> graphics/darktable. This leads to

I think that is an artifact of the same library being installed in two
places.  As far as I understood bapt@ (Cc'd), the idea is that the port
mirrors the c++ library we have in the base system, and both are
compatible, and particularly, they have the same ABI.  Basically we need
the libc++ headers to make use of libc++'s inline namespace so that
rawtherapee references libc++'s symbols (in the std::__1:: namespace)
rather than libstdc++ (in the std:: namespace).

If you are willing to experiment, you should be able to deinstall libc++
now, and both darktable and rawtherapee should continue to work with the
base libc++.

> #pkg info -r libc++-200683
> libc++-200683:
>       rawtherapee-4.0.12_1
>       darktable-1.2.3_3
> 
> #ldd /usr/local/bin/darktable | grep c++
>       libc++.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libc++.so.1 (0x4690e000)

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to