On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:14:05 +0100 Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 11.02.2014 22:10, schrieb Rainer Hurling:
>> Am 11.02.2014 21:55, schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder:
>>> My base is 10.0-RELEASE, and the port is "totally recent"
>>> (rawtherapee-4.0.12_1, Makefile r343191). converters/libiconv
>>> hadn't been installed until "right now".
>>> OTOH I'm very careful with using umlauts in file names etc. (been bitten
>>> once too often), even as my environment is UTF-8, so I might
>>> have missed that issue when testing.
>> 
>> Thanks for this info. So perhaps your situation is like the one,
>> mandree@ observed on his 10.0 box: no crashes without the patch?
> 
> I am also using 10.0-RELEASE.
> 
> So the question is if someone has (had) problems with rawtherapee on
> 10-*STABLE* (OSVERSION >= 1000500) while glib20 is still at
> glib-2.36.3_1?  Please speak up if you are one of them!
> 
> Because if so that might suggest we are facing regressions
> from 10-RELEASE to 10-STABLE and
> from 10-RELEASE to 11-STABLE.
> 
> That might warrant investigation.

10-RELEASE shipped with a faulty implementation of WCHAR_T conversion,
so it doesn't return an error but it doesn't do the right thing either.
This implementation has been backed out again after the release, so
iconv_open returns -1 again when you request WCHAR_T conversion.
The crash happens when an application doesn't test for errors and
assumes the return value is a valid pointer.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to