On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Steve Kargl <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:49:03PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Steve Kargl >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:14:43PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: >> >> I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been. >> >> Its not the first message ranting about something broken. >> >> >> > >> > I can't help but notice how poorly some decisions are made >> > within the ports community, and no, this isn't the nearly >> > the first poor decision. >> > >> > If the port has an option to build the profiled libraries >> > and that option is selected, then I expect the port to >> > build the profiled library. >> >> You're welcome to help the ports committers to maintain over 20k ports >> and raise the quality. >> Are you looking for mentors for your ports@ commit bit? >> > > Check your history. I was a port maintainer many years > ago. Dropped maintainership of all my ports after several > unreviewed changes by others to those ports were made. > These unreviewed changes broke those ports and I was > forced to clean up the mess.
So, you gave up? > This of course has little to do with the issue that I have > raised here. A port, namely math/lapack, has an option to > build profiled libraries and the port does not honor that > option when selected. It's simple Q&A. Either remove the > option or fix it. Like I said, fill out a PR and mail the maintainer. "Its broken, fix it." Doesn't work. -- William Grzybowski / wg FreeBSD Ports Committer _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
