> On 9 Feb 2017, at 5:12 PM, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:30:20PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: >> FreeBSD package management makes an ABI promise in the form of >> "FreeBSD:10:amd64", but not even pkg code itself adheres to this, >> and thus we have had subtle and yet fatal breakage in 10.2 and 10.3. > Stop spreading FUD. There is no ABI breakage on stable/10 branch, > nor there is a breakage in the package sets. We only promise > backward-compatibility, and this works as advertized. A binary compiled > on later system, is not guaranteed to work on the early system even on > the same branch. > > The current package set for stable/10 is built on 10.3 and is only > guaranteed to work on 10.3 and later. Trying to make arbitrary > combinations of binaries and base systems outside of the scope of the > project.
You're contradicting yourself here. Either it's compatible or it isn't? Cheers, Franco _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"