On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 01:28:46PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > I'm unclear on why devel/llvm80 depends on graphics ports, but > after 'svnlite update -r507241 /usr/ports' (not having updated > in some time), my poudriere bulk run reported: > > [00:23:50] [26] [00:10:36] Finished graphics/py-imagesize@py27 | > py27-imagesize-1.1.0: Failed: fetch > [00:23:50] [26] [00:10:36] Skipping devel/llvm80 | llvm80-8.0.1: Dependent > port graphics/py-imagesize@py27 | py27-imagesize-1.1.0 failed > [00:23:50] [26] [00:10:36] Skipping textproc/py-recommonmark@py27 | > py27-recommonmark-0.5.0_1: Dependent port graphics/py-imagesize@py27 | > py27-imagesize-1.1.0 failed > [00:23:50] [26] [00:10:36] Skipping textproc/py-sphinx@py27 | > py27-sphinx-1.6.5_2,1: Dependent port graphics/py-imagesize@py27 | > py27-imagesize-1.1.0 failed > [00:23:50] [26] [00:10:36] Skipping devel/xtoolchain-llvm80 | > xtoolchain-llvm80-0.1: Dependent port graphics/py-imagesize@py27 | > py27-imagesize-1.1.0 failed > ....
Well, for me, I see: g1-49(11.3-S)[491] make -C /usr/ports/devel/llvm80 all-depends-list | grep -i imagesize /common/ports/graphics/py-imagesize g1-49(11.3-S)[492] ... so, yeah, it seems to be required. And the fetch (of the distfile(s) is what failed. You could try fetching the distfile(s) manually, perhaps. If nothing else, that might provide some hints as to the nature of the failure. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org "Examples of potentially unlawful conduct include ... comments like, 'Go back to where you came from,' whether made by supervisors or ..." - EEOC See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
