On 2020-01-01 16:23, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi Adam, > >> On 1. Jan 2020, at 10:18 PM, Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote: >> [...] >> This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. > > Let me stop you right here and say: ports Framework itself is > suffering from this wishful attitude
PLUS UMPTEEN*!!! > and this has nothing to do > with readily available poudriere "replacements" which are not > as good as poudriere for sure. Assuming you can get poudriere to work. Even by today's standards, a low-cost PC is not going to have the juice to support it. And to reiterate, the ports framework itself MUST work standalone. > If the ports framework isn't seen as a stand alone infrastructure > worth its own integrity the discussion is already dead and the > quality will keep to decline for every casual FreeBSD user who > doesn't really care for this or that tool, but wants to install > software from the ports tree manually. > [...] -- George * umpteen: an unspecified large number
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
