Hi! > How is poudriere in that regard? I never used poudriere, have been > intimidated by not wanting to use zfs or dialog4ports, or such an elaborate > setup just to update one or a few ports.
poudriere is really, really useful. Because it delivers a complete, consistent package repo of all the ports (with individual options). And it does so repeatable, down to one or several seperate os versions to build for or a specific point in time for the ports tree, with some individual options etc. > I found that poudriere uses dialog4ports; I much prefer to save options in a > file such as Gentoo Linux does with make.conf and (NetBSD) pkgsrc does with > mk.conf . That works as well. I have a checkout of the ports tree, use make config to define non-default port options. This stores the selected OPTIONs in /var/db/ports/, and poudriere uses those options just fine. Combined with lots of RAM, ZFS on SSDs and ccache, compilation is very fast. -- p...@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
