On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:37 AM Patrick M. Hausen <hau...@punkt.de> wrote:
> Hi all, > > > Am 26.12.2020 um 20:04 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports < > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>: > > ...and I will continue to use portmaster. But I don't understand why > > we should no keep portsnap. > > Kudos to Stefan for keeping portmaster relevant and up-to-date. > But I never understood the appeal of portsnap. What's the advantage over > > svnlite co ... > cd /usr/ports; make update > > This mechanism is in the base system, so an extra tool demands some > justification ;-) > > Kind regards, > Patrick > -- > punkt.de GmbH > Patrick M. Hausen > .infrastructure > > Kaiserallee 13a > 76133 Karlsruhe > > Tel. +49 721 9109500 > > https://infrastructure.punkt.de > i...@punkt.de > > AG Mannheim 108285 > Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian Stein > > portsnap(8) predates svnlite by quite a bit, but you have just described why it is not really worth the overhead of maintaining it. As bugzilla describes many ticket closures, Overcome by events". -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
