On 10/28/05, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Personally, I feel that portmanager does a much better job of updating > without the problems that seem to crop up so often using portupgrade. >
I've always been scared off by the comparatively young age of portmanager. Besides, portupgrade comes with a set of useful tools, like cvsweb browser. But the fat ruby dependency and some other things make me want something else. I'd be glad to see a perl-based ports management system. Maybe I'll write one some day :-) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
