> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I point out that removing beastie was not the point of the exercise > > (contrary to Ted's paranoid fantasies of a right-wing Christian > > fundamentalist cabal dictating policy to the core team). > > In point of fact, the "logo" idea started right here when > a right-wing Christian fundamentalist complain that people > at his church were worried about Beastie on their computers. > (I have that archived in case you are inclined to try to > deny it.)
You must be a newbie. The logo argument has been going on for years. There have been suggestions about getting a new logo, both to thwart the religious bigots and to "be more professional" for a long time before that particular person worried about his/her church response. There have been good reasons and bad reasons argued and good ideas and bad ideas put forth for a long time. > These are exactly the same people who will support the > Department of Homeland Security when it decides that everyone > must use one the "approved" (i.e. big commercial) operating > systems because of 9-11. Some of them. And some are not. Your brush is so wide, it can't help but dripping back on yourself. ////jerry > > When you start caving to such people, there is no stopping. > > -- > Lars Eighner > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.larseighner.com/index.html > 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
