Benjamin Thelen wrote:
Russell E. Meek schrieb:
Benjamin Thelen wrote:
Russell E. Meek schrieb:
Jeff D. Hamann wrote:
OpenSSL is in the base system and the library version should be
4, not
3. Is there some reason you're installing it from the ports?
I have no idea. I didn't know it was part of the base system, but
when I went to install apache2, postgresql, etc, those ports
wanted to install the openssl port or at least they used to.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lowell Gilbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: broken openssl on freebsd60
"Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I should preface this with "I'm not sure if this is correct but
I've
got a server running that doesn't make exstensive use of openssl
and
everything seems to run alright for the apps I've been running"...
so,
I've been trying to install a new server using the openssl port and
keep finding problems with the openssl libs...
$ pwd
/usr/local/lib
$ ls -la libssl*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 516602 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so ->
libssl.so.4
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 318507 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so.4
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so ->
libssl3.so.1
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl3.so.1
$
should those be:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so ->
libssl.so.3
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl.so.3
or some such thing, because when I attempt to start something like
postgresql81, I get:
$ psql
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found,
required
by "psql"
$
I need to get the following apps running on the new FREEBSD 6.0
machine:
1) openssl
then,
2) apache2
3) subversion
4) uw-imap
5) postgresql81 or postgresql80+postgis
6) php
etc, etc, etc and I'm concerned that none of those will work
with the
current status of openssl on freebsd 6.0. I'm running
$ uname -a
FreeBSD bobby.xxx.xxx 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #1: Fri
Nov 18
10:47:37 PST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
OpenSSL is in the base system and the library version should be
4, not
3. Is there some reason you're installing it from the ports?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Another user had a similar issue like this with OpenSSL, here is
what I advised him to do which in the end worked perfectly.
Edit your make.conf file *"/etc/make.conf" *and please in the
following:
*WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes
*This will cause all future installed ports to build against the
base version of OpenSSL rather than trying to install the port
version as a dependency.
You can then uninstall the port version of openssl
*"/usr/ports/security/openssl make deinstall clean"*
Once the uninstall is complete, reinstall all OpenSSL required
ports either by using portupgrade or by manually deinstalling and
then reinstalling the port as they will now build against the base
version of OpenSSL.
Hi,
I already read your posting a few days ago. What I don't understand
is, that openssl is per default within the base system, isn't it?
So, I would suppose that any port, which requires openssl, would
take it from the base rather than from ports? At least, I never
installed a port, installing openssl from ports as a dependency
(e.g. php5-openssl).
I don't really get it. Could you explain why this switch in
make.conf is needed then?
This would also mean, that I would have to upgrade the base system
openssl to openssl-beta in order to be able to install OOo-2 as
having openssl within the base system _and_ openssl-beta as a port
obviously leads to little confusion.
Thanks,
Ben
Thanks,
Russell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ben,
Sorry about the confusion, make.conf is the global register that all
ports look to for build information.
By default ports requiring dependancies will build these dependancies
according to their individual make file (normally ports.)
(man make.conf) will show you more in depth about what the make.conf
is file and many of the global registers that can be used.
Hello Russel,
Thanks for the clarification, I understand now.
php5-openssl is just a shared extension, how did you install Apache
with OpenSSL? Port or Base?
Base, just "portinstall apache+mod_ssl".
How are you installing OpenOffice 2 to where it requires OpenSSL, I
do not see OpenSSL as a dependancy?
A package from http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/. I was suprised,
too, there actually is no OpenSSL dependancy, but pk_add complains
and, I think, even stops installing OOo-2. So I was forced to install
the oSSH-port, because building OOo-2 is a little nightmare :-).
Thanks,
Ben
Thanks,
Russell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ben,
Thanks for the heads up about Open Office.org.
Thanks,
Russell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
