Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 07:25 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-12-19 08:59, Adam Lofstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
before the network is initialized), I have created a startup script
(smbfsstartup.sh) and placed it in /usr/local/etc/rc.d:
case "$1" in
start)
/sbin/mount /myshare
;;
stop)
#Maybe do something here...
;;
*)
;;
esac
This exact same script worked just fine on another machine. When I
moved it to a different machine I get this message when my system boots
up:
Local Package Initialization : (skipping smbfsstartup.sh, not
executable).
Take a look at the permissions of the script file with ls(1). The
message is very verbose already. The file has a name that ends in
`.sh' but it is not executable, and this is why it's skipped.
Quick fix:
# chmod 0750 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smbfsstartup.sh
- Giorgos
Pardon moir for chiming in here, but I have noticed 3 different posts about
the proper chmod for the executable on this thread: 744, 755 and now 750
.....I've typically used 755, but if there is some reason for the others as
a preference I would be interested in the reasons. or when one should be
used over the other...
Not second-guessing, just curious. Thanks & Merry Xmas!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
SageOne Net
http://www.sage-one.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
I actually prefer 700.
No one has any business in /usr/local/etc/rc.d unless they are root.
.daniel.schrock
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
