On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:18:13AM -0400, Duane Whitty wrote: > Mike Loiterman wrote: > >This is my supfile: > > > >*default host=cvsup1.FreeBSD.org > >*default base=/usr > >*default prefix=/usr > >*default release=cvs > >*default tag=RELENG_6_0 > >*default delete use-rel-suffix > > > >src-all > > > >*default tag=. > >ports-all > >doc-all > > > >I have been using it like this for years, obviously changing to the latest > >release tag. I haven't had problem and I'm not having problems, but my > >question is this: > > > >Is it advisable to sync my source to RELEASE, but to CURRENT for ports? > >Typically, I upgade my ports a few days after they get updated so I'm > >always > >running the latest version, but would it be better to sync both ports and > >source to RELEASE? > > > Hi Mike, > > It would be nice I guess if ports were tagged like src but they are not. > Basically HEAD is all there is vis-a-vis tags. You can specify a > specific date however.
Ports *are* tagged for each release, but they are not branched. > > Duane > >Obviously, it depends, somewhat, on personal choice, but in terms of > >stablity and "correctness" which is better? > > -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"