On 3/14/06, Mike Loiterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik Trulsson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:18:13AM -0400, Duane Whitty wrote: > >> Mike Loiterman wrote: > >>> Is it advisable to sync my source to RELEASE, but to CURRENT for > >>> ports? Typically, I upgade my ports a few days after they get > >>> updated so I'm always running the latest version, but would it be > >>> better to sync both ports and source to RELEASE? > >>> > >> It would be nice I guess if ports were tagged like src but they are > >> not. Basically HEAD is all there is vis-a-vis tags. You can specify > >> a specific date however. > > > > Ports *are* tagged for each release, but they are not branched. > > Yes, I know, which is why I asked the question...which is better?
As I understand it, release tagsare static. If you specify a release tag, you get the ports as they were at the time of that release. Ports don't branch with releases, so if you want updated ports, you use "tag=." - Bob _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
