On Tuesday 11 July 2006 21:21, Alistair Sutton wrote: > On 11/07/06, Beni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > When trying to "portupgrade -rR tcl" all I get is what looks like an > > endless list of messages like this : > > [snip] > > I'd probably start by getting rid of the "-rR" from your portupgrade > command as (unless I'm misreading the man page) that will try to > upgrade all the ports that tcl depends on, plus all the ports that > depend on it. > > Just running "portupgrade tcl" should be all you need to do. Whether > or not it will fix the problem you're describing I'm not sure but give > it a try. > I'm running a "portupgrade tcl" right now (without the -rR options) but I get the same output back :
[...] ==== fCmd-20.1 TraverseUnixTree : failure opening a subdirectory directory FAILED ==== Contents of test case: catch {file delete -force -- tfa} file mkdir tfa file mkdir tfa/a file attributes tfa/a -permissions 0000 set result [catch {file delete -force tfa}] file attributes tfa/a -permissions 0777 file delete -force tfa set result ---- Test generated error; Return code was: 1 ---- Return code should have been one of: 0 2 ---- errorInfo: could not set permissions for file "tfa/a": no such file or directory while executing "file attributes tfa/a -permissions 0777" ("uplevel" body line 7) invoked from within "uplevel 1 $script" ---- errorCode: POSIX ENOENT {no such file or directory} ==== fCmd-20.1 FAILED fileName.test fileSystem.test for-old.test for.test foreach.test format.test get.test history.test http.test ==== http-3.3 http::geturl FAILED [...] So removing the recursive/upward-recursive options doesn't seem to be doing any good. Btw, until now I've always upgraded my ports with the -rR options without any problems. Beni. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"