On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:39:12PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-10-29 20:50, Stephen Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's been drawn to my attention not to use bash from the ports > > collection, because if one of it's dependencies (gettext or libiconv) > > fails or is updated significantly, it could break, and prevent > > login. The suggested solution was to use a base shell (such as sh) and > > append 'bash -l' to .shrc to automatically enter bash. > > > > The quite annoying side-effect is having to type 'exit' twice to get > > out of a su shell or screen. > > > > Would it be a better idea to use the pre-compiled binary for bash? > > And if I did so, could I be alerted to updates as easy as using > > 'pkg_version -v' when checking if any ports need updating? > > I've been using the following for some time: > > keramida> su - > Password: ******** > root# exec env SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash bash -l
I know it doesn't work on slolaris^W some Unix flavors, but I've been quite happy with "su -m". It changes workflow in many ways, but once you get a handle of it, it can really be useful. E.g. my zsh history is shared between root and the user who su'd into him. And if anything goes wrong, I just drop the -m key. It's another story when it comes to remote login (non-root)... _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
