Chad Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:39:31AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Chad Perrin wrote: >> >>> That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep available to >>> both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stable read/write access with >>> reasonably high access performance for both (fast enough to achieve >>> decent frame rates, for instance). This seems to rule out both ext3 and >>> UFS2. What filesystem(s) meet(s) my needs in this case? >> Since you didn't state anything about reliability, ext2 will maybe help >> you :) > > I thought "stable" covered that.
ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works". Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack of journaling shouldn't bother you much.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
