Ivan Voras wrote: > ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's > 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works". > > Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack > of journaling shouldn't bother you much.
I suggest that ext2+noatime is going to give him much better performance vs. ext3 anyway. -- Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.' Mark D. Foster, CISSP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mark.foster.cc/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"