Ivan Voras wrote:
> ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's
> 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works".
>
> Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack
> of journaling shouldn't bother you much.

I suggest that ext2+noatime is going to give him much better performance
vs. ext3 anyway.

-- 
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the 
 intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.'
Mark D. Foster, CISSP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://mark.foster.cc/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to