PJ wrote: > I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently > more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that > it is "lighter" whatever that may mean. > Anyone know anything about this? > TIA > PJ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org > Could F3 be the alternative/replacement? http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/f3:_a_replacement_for_flash%3F http://blogs.sun.com/chrisoliver/
I'd like to hear some opinions on this. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
