On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, PJ <af.gour...@videotron.ca> wrote:

> PJ wrote:
> > I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently
> > more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that
> > it is "lighter" whatever that may mean.
> > Anyone know anything about this?
>

I think you are referring to Silverlight, right?

Silverlight on FreeBSD is extremely lightweight.

regards,

usleep


> > TIA
> > PJ
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
> >
> Could F3 be the alternative/replacement?
> http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/f3:_a_replacement_for_flash%3F
> http://blogs.sun.com/chrisoliver/
>
> I'd like to hear some opinions on this.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to