On 2 April 2011 18:22, Chris Rees <utis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 April 2011 18:07, Mike Jeays <mike.je...@rogers.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100 >> Chris Rees <utis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j>=0;) print a[j--] }' | >>> awk '{print($2" ["$1"]");}' | sed -e 's,[^-][^/]*/,--,g' -e 's,^,|,' >> >> >> I confess to being impressed... >> > > Yeah, but perhaps I should have used sed instead of the second awk; > fewer processes: > > du -h | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j>=0;) print a[j--] }' | sed > -e 's,^[^1-9]*\([^___CTRL-V+TAB______]*\)____CTRL-V+TAB_____*\(.*\)$,\2 > \[\1\],;s,[^-][^/]*/,--,g;s,^,|,' > > That does exactly the same -- where I've put ____CTRL-V+TAB______ you > have to type Ctrl-V, then a literal [::tab::] key; BSD sed doesn't do > \t. > > Chris >
Final version: http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/graphical_du.sh Maybe I should port it... Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"