On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Dmitri Brengauz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin <per...@apotheon.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote: > > > > > > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox. > > > > Nah. Stick with Fluxbox. > > Sorry, but why? I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under > current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much > difference. But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are > recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox. What would be the reason?
Fluxbox supports window tabbing. Last I checked, OpenBox did not. In fact, amongst the 'box window managers, window tabbing is pretty much the killer feature. That, and it has a better license than OpenBox. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpXiIofe5VT6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
