On 10.12.2011 15:44, Da Rock wrote:
So how does soft-update journaling compare to gjournal? I'm using gjournal now
and it runs a bit of a dog, but it is reliable (until another ufs filesystem
turns up at boot) and necessary in my environment. Can I dump it for this new
one?
Its used on a laptop with heavy load on the disk, the power on the battery can
run out too quick for batterymon to shut it down- plus kids that play silly
monkeys with daddy's laptop... :)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I am not an expert, but this is how I currently understand this:
Geom-journal is a block level journaling mechanism. It means that all data
written on a journaled provider will be first written to the providers journal
and then later commited to the provider. Thus data is written twice to provide
more redundancy.
Soft-updates by itself has nothing to do with any journaling. It simply makes
synchronous writes faster. When a filesystem is mounted synchronously, each
write to a file first updates the metadata of the file, such a file size, and
after that writes the actual data into the disk. When doing operations on
thousands of small files, the overhead from synchronous writing is considerable.
Bring forth soft-updates, which caches the metadata (file size etc.) updates
into ram, and commits these updates into disk later when a delay and some
conditions trigger; actual data is written into disk as soon as possible. Thus
append/random access operations on gazillion of files are a lot faster.
From this I would conclude that soft-updates journaling tries to write the
metadata updates into a filesystem spesific soft-update journal (the soft-update
journal being a file maybe?) sooner than they are actually committed. I also
suspect that soft-updates journaling has some clever way of detecting when it
is, performance wise, okay to update the journal and/or commit updates.
In short:
- gjournal writes both data and metadata, providing more redundancy to the
actual data AND filesystem integrity while slowing down write operations
(although I do not have data how much it slows down disk i/o)
- journaled soft-updates writes metadata updates twice on the disk, providing
redundancy to file system integrity, but does not prevent actual data loss.
I do not even use FreeBSD 9.0 myself, my information is totally third party,
second hand, wise-cracks and guessing.
Any expert consultation would be appreciated.
--
Arto Pekkanen
ksym@IRCnet
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
