I think it is incorrect to assume that a failure with ZFS that cannot be
recovered could be recovered if you used UFS with fsck.
i think it is incorrect to not read carefully.
So explanation - ZFS failure NOT caused by disks failure cannot be usually
recovered.
But even if i am wrong at this, rest still apply.
What fsck fixes in
other file systems doesn't apply to ZFS by ZFS's design. fsck deals with
fixing superblock inconsistancies on non-journaled file systems (like
UFS/UFS2), not resurecting corrupted blocks on a disk.
http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6071-No,-ZFS-really-doesnt-need-a-fsck.html
yes i know that article.
And it is truly funny for me to know people do think this way.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
