--As of August 5, 2012 10:29:16 AM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have
said:
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the differentiator.
The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do
you have some benchmarks for that?
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Particularly in this use-case: From my reading ZFS has a performance hit
when used as a base filesystem for NFS. (Largely because it insists on
*actually following* the NFS spec, and not taking some shortcuts that are
common elsewhere...) Not that I have tested that, even on my NFS server.
(Which runs ZFS - there are other excellent reasons to use it, and speed
isn't a major concern for that particular box.)
Daniel T. Staal
---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
