On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:55:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 10/6/04 6:47:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:42:24PM -0400, Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote: > > Where's the documentation? I'd like to see this for myself. > > There is none, because Mr./Ms. TM4525 is making up his/her "facts" to > suit their assertion. The last time this claim was made it was > refuted and TM4525 promised to go away and check 5.3 performance. > > Kris > ---------------------------------- > > Actually, Kris, it wasn't "refuted", you said that the exceptionally poor > performance was "expected" until 5.3 was released, and implied that > anyone who expected good performance was making a fool of themselves. > > Search google groups for "freebsd 5.2 performance woes" and sort by date > to see my test details and subsequent comments by Kris and the other > FreeBSD Spin Doctors. > > My tests are very controlled, and my "assertion" is a result of exceptionally > poor performance in the test. And no-one "refuted" my results. More > like jockeying to save face. > > Nor did I "promise to go away". I promised to test 5.3 and post > the results.
We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks show very good results compared to 4.x. Kris
pgpJZOfsrUDCZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature