On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:19:25 +0100, Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It ran for eight years without errors. On a different OS. > So your saying an anciety copy of NT is more reliable than a current > copy of FreeBSD? Don't try and put your words in my mouth. On your ancient hardware with an ancient OS you didn't have problems. Why not stick with it if it's been so reliable? > Anthony Frem. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
